Please be aware that Slushe.com loads images in the WebP image file format. If you're using a Safari browser older than Safari version 14, you may not be able to load WebP images. Please load Slushe.com in a different browser (e.g. Chrome, FireFox, etc.) to improve your user experience if this is the case.

This thread has been closed.

Moderators: alice, miro, MarieFasolt, Olympus3DX, Steves3d, pandan, Vanessa
Viewing 261 to 280 of 510

Jan 22, 2020

Post about your user experience and suggestions for site improvements here
xide said:I've been here for a week now and I simply love this site so much more than DA or any others i'm a member of. I just made a post on my DA page announcing that I tend to spend most of my time here and inviting people to come see my art that is too hot for DA on Slushe. Keep up the great work! 

Well, I think I can speak for the staff here, and thank you for the kind words, and that we are pleased you love the site:)

Jan 25, 2020

I would like to suggest the support of 360 panorama images. The ability to scroll around via pc/mac browser or pan around via mobile gyro or touch. The most common format appears to equirectangular images.

I think it would be a great stepping stone for still renders and potentially leading into vr content later.

I'm not certain if its already supported but i'm planning to experiment later on the site.


Jan 25, 2020

Pornism said:

I would like to suggest the support of 360 panorama images. The ability to scroll around via pc/mac browser or pan around via mobile gyro or touch. The most common format appears to equirectangular images.

I think it would be a great stepping stone for still renders and potentially leading into vr content later.

I'm not certain if its already supported but i'm planning to experiment later on the site.



This is something I will put to the team.

Feb 03, 2020

Lol. Why did you break the preview display on the main page? Now the preview for some reason displays part of the image in the center, instead of covering everything as it was before.
Will this be fixed or will it remain so forever?
If you want to do this correctly, you must allow the user to decide what will be displayed on the preview. Or at least return it as it was.

Edited by: Hold

Feb 03, 2020

Hold said:

Lol. Why did you break the preview display on the main page? Now the preview for some reason displays part of the image in the center, instead of covering everything as it was before.
Will this be fixed or will it remain so forever?
If you want to do this correctly, you must allow the user to decide what will be displayed on the preview. Or at least return it as it was.


The Dev team have been informed of this and are working on a fix 

Feb 03, 2020

Hold said:

Lol. Why did you break the preview display on the main page? Now the preview for some reason displays part of the image in the center, instead of covering everything as it was before.
Will this be fixed or will it remain so forever?
If you want to do this correctly, you must allow the user to decide what will be displayed on the preview. Or at least return it as it was.


The Dev team have been informed of this and are working on a fix 

Feb 04, 2020

Hold said:

Lol. Why did you break the preview display on the main page? Now the preview for some reason displays part of the image in the center, instead of covering everything as it was before.
Will this be fixed or will it remain so forever?
If you want to do this correctly, you must allow the user to decide what will be displayed on the preview. Or at least return it as it was.


Yeah, I've got this problem everywhere, not just on the main page. It's completely random though. Some thumbnails still work like normal, others are zoomed into the center of the image.

Feb 04, 2020

WilsonHoncho said:
Hold said:

Lol. Why did you break the preview display on the main page? Now the preview for some reason displays part of the image in the center, instead of covering everything as it was before.
Will this be fixed or will it remain so forever?
If you want to do this correctly, you must allow the user to decide what will be displayed on the preview. Or at least return it as it was.


Yeah, I've got this problem everywhere, not just on the main page. It's completely random though. Some thumbnails still work like normal, others are zoomed into the center of the image.

It is being worked on

Feb 05, 2020

Hi. I do not know where to report bugs, so I will write here ( give a link if there is a special place for this). 

I uploaded the animation in mp4, the ratio is 9:16, the resolution is 608 x1080, and your site returns me a broken preview. I tried it three times. Animations in the ratio of 16:9 give the preview correctly.
link to the animation

Edited by: Hold

Feb 05, 2020

Hold said:

Hi. I do not know where to report bugs, so I will write here ( give a link if there is a special place for this). 

I uploaded the animation in mp4, the ratio is 9:16, the resolution is 608 x1080, and your site returns me a broken preview. I tried it three times. Animations in the ratio of 16:9 give the preview correctly.
link to the animation


Hey there. I will bring this to the attention of the Dev Team.

Feb 09, 2020

I have a question, it's not to criticize but if you look at the images of https://slushe.com/galleries/i-love-shemales-ii-21739.html they're all natural images and that's okay but I thought one of the conditions is that this site is to show personally made digitally processed computer art. Or is it allowed to post plain unprocessed naturally taken photos that aren't digitally tweaked or produced or personally crafted? I'd like to know cos it's a bit unclear to me. In my opinion this site is to display digitally processed erotic computer artwork, preferably 3D, hence the term 3DX. 2D or simple black/white pencil drawings I can tolerate since that's an artwork crafted by the artist, though to me they're not masterworks. But if you collect a bunch of already existing naturally taken photographs as in https://slushe.com/galleries/i-love-shemales-i-21728.html well there's no artistic crafted process in that. In my opinion 3DX computer art is like the masterpieces of the likes of SMZ69 or Taziota or PowerUp3DX or LCKX...

Feb 09, 2020

evasurga said:

I have a question, it's not to criticize but if you look at the images of https://slushe.com/galleries/i-love-shemales-ii-21739.html they're all natural images and that's okay but I thought one of the conditions is that this site is to show personally made digitally processed computer art. Or is it allowed to post plain unprocessed naturally taken photos that aren't digitally tweaked or produced or personally crafted? I'd like to know cos it's a bit unclear to me. In my opinion this site is to display digitally processed erotic computer artwork, preferably 3D, hence the term 3DX. 2D or simple black/white pencil drawings I can tolerate since that's an artwork crafted by the artist, though to me they're not masterworks. But if you collect a bunch of already existing naturally taken photographs as in https://slushe.com/galleries/i-love-shemales-i-21728.html well there's no artistic crafted process in that. In my opinion 3DX computer art is like the masterpieces of the likes of SMZ69 or Taziota or PowerUp3DX or LCKX...


I have seen these and I have dealt with them.

If you clear your cache and refresh your browser you should find they are gone.

Feb 12, 2020

Just wanted to stop in and say you guys are doing an awesome job at the site and I love this place. Thanks for keeping the site strictly 3DX/digital art regarding the post above.

I did have one other suggestion to add. Perhaps a stats page so I can see which of my images get the most views/likes/favorites so when i'm in the thought process of creating my next scene I could go check my stats to see what work of mine people like most and create something similar to the top 5 or create a part 2, 3, etc.

Feb 12, 2020

xide said:

Just wanted to stop in and say you guys are doing an awesome job at the site and I love this place. Thanks for keeping the site strictly 3DX/digital art regarding the post above.

I did have one other suggestion to add. Perhaps a stats page so I can see which of my images get the most views/likes/favorites so when i'm in the thought process of creating my next scene I could go check my stats to see what work of mine people like most and create something similar to the top 5 or create a part 2, 3, etc.


If it's not already in line, I i will put it on the list of suggestions

Feb 15, 2020


Hi,Is there a way to get more information about the views? I am having (and I'm happy for that) a growth in views but it's not easy to understand this data. I have to check manually every image I posted. A report system (like youtube) could be useful for that. Thanks a lot.

Feb 15, 2020

StokkaFilippo said:

Hi,Is there a way to get more information about the views? I am having (and I'm happy for that) a growth in views but it's not easy to understand this data. I have to check manually every image I posted. A report system (like youtube) could be useful for that. Thanks a lot.


Can put this to the team,  If it is something they can do, it might not appear until the phase 2 roll out of the site

Feb 16, 2020

The comments could use some sort of emoticons.  

Typing :) :D :thumbsup: 8) is all well and good but I personally like a small collection of images to convey basic emotion when I type.

Feb 16, 2020

bikdingle said:

The comments could use some sort of emoticons.  

Typing :) :D :thumbsup: 8) is all well and good but I personally like a small collection of images to convey basic emotion when I type.


I agree that the comments box could do with emojis.

I will put this forward as a task.



Feb 25, 2020

A tragic thing happened to me:


https://slushe.com/galleries/a-new-girl-22662.html#comment-657634


I was typing a nice, long, artistic comment in response to someone. I was logged in when typing. When I've finished typing after an hour, I click on send it button assuming I was still logged in. However, a message popped up saying you must be logged in to post your comment. But I was logged in! So I logged in again, but my comment I crafted an hour long was gone!

So this is a warning to all Slushe people: if you type a long comment, say you took an hour to type it, then FIRST COPYPASTE your comment, before sending it. Because although you're still logged in, Slushe site may ask a log in renewal and done so, your comment text in the comment text editor field IS GONE!

This is so sad for me. Especially because I love artistic writing.

Feb 25, 2020

evasurga said:

A tragic thing happened to me:


https://slushe.com/galleries/a-new-girl-22662.html#comment-657634


I was typing a nice, long, artistic comment in response to someone. I was logged in when typing. When I've finished typing after an hour, I click on send it button assuming I was still logged in. However, a message popped up saying you must be logged in to post your comment. But I was logged in! So I logged in again, but my comment I crafted an hour long was gone!

So this is a warning to all Slushe people: if you type a long comment, say you took an hour to type it, then FIRST COPYPASTE your comment, before sending it. Because although you're still logged in, Slushe site may ask a log in renewal and done so, your comment text in the comment text editor field IS GONE!

This is so sad for me. Especially because I love artistic writing.


I will bring it to the teams attention that there is an issue with being logged out, and get the Dev team on it
Viewing 261 to 280 of 510